RECORD REVIEWS

Radiohead —In Rainbows

{9}

With the amount of text burned over the past few weeks on Radiohead latest album, its unconventional and industry-busting release method and the general fervor over the first new Radiohead songs in four years, you’d think Thom and the boys had just single-handedly talked Iran out of nukes, made the Israeli and Palestinians become buddies, taught Britney to be a perfect mother and re-balanced the Earth’s carbon budget. Of course, they haven’t done any of those things, but they have attempted to turn the music industry on end, releasing In Rainbows all by their lonesome as a digital download (with a physical release down the pike) where you name your own price (Shatner be damned), giving all the power to the band and fans rather than Big Corporate Monsters. Whether this release permanently changes anything is yet to be seen, but for a band that is vanguard for the current world of modern rock, releasing an album that will not appear on the US or UK charts is quite a leap of faith that this new release methodology works, and if it does, look for the major labels to try to sue everyone in sight to keep their revenue streams open as more bands try to break free.

However, business models be damned! The real reason people are excited is that people love Radiohead. They’re as close to a true career band as comes along anymore and they’re paving their way to Rock and Roll Valhalla. The question becomes, beyond the secretive and groundbreaking method of release, is In Rainbows any good? The answer is a resounding “yes”. Is it the best Radiohead album ever? “Probably not”. It is, however, one of their better discs in a while where the band seems to have traded in the gloom and doom of Hail to the Thief for a brighter outlook on life, and with the frenzy stirred up by their fans over this release, who can blame them?

In Rainbows has no official album cover I can figure out, however it does have a specific sequencing, at least according to the file names of the download. “15 Steps” opens the album and begins with sounds more reminiscent of Thom Yorke’s solo disc, Eraser, however after the distorted beats and Yorke’s falsetto vocals have brought us in, we’re greeted by Johnny Greenwood’s surprisingly happy and uplifting guitar line – it is remarkable how much it changes the character of the song, creating a dreamlike mood to the song. It is undeniably Radiohead, but also undeniably upbeat. However, it seems like many of us have been first drawn to “Nude,” a drifting song in the same vain as “Subterranean Homesick Alien” or “Exit Music (for a Film)”. The song is beautiful, with Yorke’s vocals and Greenwood’s guitars wrapped around each other like a vine to a tree, “Nude” might be one of Radiohead’s finest songs to date, it is a testament to the band and their music. Another high point has to be “All I Need,” a darker, more somber number that seems to have affinities to tracks from Amnesiacs or Kid A, with its thick and syrupy synthesizer. Yorke’s vocals stay below the stratosphere and mix in with the ominous tones, creating melancholy love song of the highest order.

If anything, In Rainbows exhibits the diversity of Radiohead’s sound. “Faust Arp” is a quieter and more stripped down (minus the string arrangement), coming across as a slighter more optimistic version of “Street Spirit (Fade Out)”. It displays a side of Radiohead we haven’t seen in many years, as a straightforward rock band. The same might be said for “Bodysnatchers,” which is about as straight a rock song as the band as recorded in years, but unfortunately just doesn’t stand up to the rest of the music on the album.

Other turns the band takes in “Weird Fishes/Arpeggio,” a song that continues the trend of optimistic and uplifting Radiohead songs, it could almost be considered as close as Radiohead has ever been to becoming R.E.M. or U2 (sorry if that just offended anyone). “Jigsaw Falling Into Place” starts off like a restrained Hail to the Thief’s “2+2=5,” rapidly morphing into a swiftly moving song that has few brothers in the Radiohead oeuvre, instead talking the band into a more raw and unproduced sound that is refreshing, right down to the pure guitar work and controlled vocals from Thom Yorke. The closing song, “Videotape” is more what we’ve come to expect from the band, a plaintive, somber track that starts with hollow piano and Yorke’s vocals slowly get invaded by a collage of sound that brings the album to a close. I have to admit, this is far from a well-aged view of In Rainbows.

Just like the rest of the world, I’ve had about 20 hours now (as of writing) to absorb and digest the album. I can say this much about In Rainbows: it is good, probably very good, probably very very good. How it will sit in the pantheon of Radiohead albums is hard to tell at this point, but on my gut reaction right now, it is in the upper half, lower than OK Computer or Amnesiac, higher than Hail to the Thief. This album might be one of the most challenging discs the band has released, even without considering their novel release approach, as it incorporates the band’s penchant for genre-bending noise and a newfound love for restrained rock compositions. Wherever it ends up falling, In Rainbows will be a milestone in the history of rock music, both for its business model and its position in the Radiohead discography.

(BTW, if you're curious, I paid 4 UK for the download, plus the 45p credit card fee.) 

1

Erik Gonzalez said on October 11, 2007:

Oh yeah, if you're looking for album artwork,P4K has a real gem:

2

Pek said on October 11, 2007:

I think this record is really great too, but I do hope you review it again after it's been out a little longer - I don't think less than a day of release is really long enough to truly judge an album, especially considering all the hype swirling around In Rainbows.. They spent two years on it, they deserve at least a week of listening to digest it all and then affix a score to it.

3

imaginary dana said on October 11, 2007:

Pek, I'm inclined to agree with you... though the online music reviewing world at large does not. Pitchfork and Aversion and Stereogum all have reviews up today as well.

Perhaps we should write again in three weeks with a "Radiohead: in Rainbows, revisited" review?

4

Erik Gonzalez said on October 11, 2007:

I tend to agree too (as I said in the last paragraph), but people want their comments on the disc so why not get some first order thoughts out there?

5

imaginary liz said on October 11, 2007:

I agree with Erik and Dana - the onliners require real time reviews... and I am sooooo proud of Erik belting out such eloquence and heartiness (above) in mere hours!

That said, I LOVE Erik's reviews (even when he's writing about bands I can't stand) -- and would totally welcome a 2nd, 3rd, and 10th review of the album from him. Would it be better to take a journal stance?:

Dear Diary,
Today, day 15 with the record, Radiohead's In Rainbows reminds me of a warm summers day and the guitar in the Kink's song "Two Sisters."

The more Erik stuff the better. Although, I know he's got a red hot stack of cds on his desk demanding attention too.

Erik, did you buy the boxset? Do you think listening to the album in boxset format would affect your opinions at all?

6

Tim Hanken said on October 11, 2007:

Going to have to post another review in December when the other half of the record comes out. WE GET EIGHT MORE SONGS!

I listened to this record probably eight times yesterday and I think my favorite is “Jigsaw Falling Into Place”, the tempo and the lulls in certain places will allow them to really do some amazing things with it live.

7

Erik Gonzalez said on October 11, 2007:

No boxset ordering ... there is only so far a scientists salary will get you, although listening to the album as double vinyl might change some things ...

8

Wally the Moose said on October 11, 2007:

I agree with Pek, Dana, Liz, Erik and evceryone else, about keeping up with reviews on other sites.

Though, that Aversion one you mentioned isn't really a "review" in the way I'd say Erik's is a review or Pitchfork's is. I'm not sure how I feel about that one.

9

Erik Gonzalez said on October 12, 2007:

FYI, As of 10/12, the current estimate is 1.2 million downloads of In Rainbows so far ...

10

imaginary dana said on October 12, 2007:

That is incredible, tho not unexpected. Shhhh don't tell anyone, but I haven't downloaded mine yet. So really, it's 1,200,001 downloads total.

11

imaginary embracey said on October 13, 2007:

OK, I've even downloaded it. And it's all I've been listening to the last two days.

12

randy said on October 15, 2007:

Pitchfork has given it 9.3. Personally, I think that score's too high. The album could have used more up-tempo numbers. Bodysnatchers is the only one that really rocks me. But I'm sure I'm in the minority on this, displaying my lack of hipster cred and whatnot.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <strike> <object> <param> <embed>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options