IMAGI-BLOG
Keith Richards pissed at poor review
Submitted by imaginary char on August 29, 2007.Keith is angry at a Swedish newspaper for running a bad show review saying Richards was "superdrunk". Here's the full article:
STOCKHOLM, Sweden - Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards has demanded an apology from Swedish newspapers for their scathing reviews of the group's performance in the country earlier this month.
Tabloids Expressen and Aftonbladet gave thumbs down to the Aug. 3 concert at Ullevi stadium in Goteborg, with Expressen suggesting Richards was "superdrunk" on stage.
"This is a first!" the 63-year-old rock star wrote in a letter published by Stockholm daily Dagens Nyheter. "Never before have I risen to the bait of a bad review.
"But this time ... I have to stand up ... for our fans all over Sweden ... to say that you owe them, and us, an apology."
Dagens Nyheter said it received the letter from concert organizer EMA Telstar. Company head Thomas Johansson told The Associated Press that Richards wrote the letter and gave it to him after reading translations of the Swedish reviews.
"There were 56,000 people in Ullevi stadium who bought a ticket to our concert — and experienced a completely different show than the one you 'reviewed,'" the letter said.
"How dare you cheapen the experience for them — and for the hundreds of thousands of other people across Sweden who weren't at Ullevi and have only your 'review' to go on.
"Write the truth. It was a good show."
In his review, Aftonbladet's music writer Markus Larsson gave the concert a score of two on a five-point scale, and said Richards appeared "a bit confused."
"I am not going to apologize for my subjective opinion," Larsson told the paper's Web edition on Wednesday. "It is Keith who should apologize. After all it costs around $145 to see a rock star who can hardly handle the (guitar) riff to 'Brown Sugar' any more."
What do you think? Should the writer apologize? Is Keith being a whiner (and a wino?)
Full article here.
elle said on August 29, 2007:
[Although I'm only starting out] I've thought about this before when typing out an article, "Boy, I sure hope that is what they really said between songs..." However, we tend to keep it a bit nicer around here, so I'm not that worried.
With that said, isn't Keith Richards known as a drunk? Didn't Johnny Depp say he based his drunken pirate character quirks off of him? Shouldn't he be more pissed about that?
imaginary dana said on August 29, 2007:
I'm sure the entire world is shocked a critic reported Keith Richards as "superdrunk." Did they really make that a single word? I love it and plan to use it in a review, shortly!
Perhaps at Bumbershoot this weekend, I'm hoping...
imaginary char said on August 29, 2007:
Bumbersuperdrunk may be considered a single word as well.
imaginary dana said on August 29, 2007:
Shane, something tells me that you'd be really good at it!
randy said on August 29, 2007:
I was a huge Stones fan years ago, but now I wish they'd just die already.
imaginary char said on August 29, 2007:
Shane, why not a Bumbersuperdrunk? Are you working your way up? (or is it down??)
Erik Gonzalez said on August 29, 2007:
Critics should never apologize unless they said something bad about someone's mother.