! = recommended
* = all-ages
Don't see your show on our calendar? Contact our calendar editor.
Many of you have probably noticed an exciting new feature on Three Imaginary Girls: we've now enabled comments on ALL articles, not just blog posts. This means you can tell us what you think of our record reviews, live show reviews, film reviews... well, anything you read on TIG.
This goes for all new articles as well as all articles since the beginning of Three Imaginary Girls. Go back in time and tell us when we goofed up! Or when we nailed a review. Or when you were at the same show we attended.
Cases in point.....
We want to hear from you! In fact, we're counting on your input to keep us honest and keep our imaginary community a'chattering. So jump on in and comment away...
1 Powerpop-Gary said on June 13, 2007
Although I haven't used it yet, I love having the comments turned on for all the articles. It's a cool feature (that hopefully doesn't backfire when bad reviews are posted!).
2 imaginary dana said on June 13, 2007
Oh we won't call that backfiring... we'll call that an imaginary group discussion!
Bring it.
3 Erik Gonzalez said on June 13, 2007
I love the comments. I want people to post as many comments or questions as they can (again, my desperate plea for a mailbag).
4 imaginary dana said on June 13, 2007
People, EMAIL ERIK!!!!! He's really nice and he will write you back!
5 Joseph Riippi said on June 13, 2007
I was NOT pissed about the Sun Kil Moon panning. Why? Because I ripped it and IT FUCKING SUCKED.
This from a life-long Red House Painters fan...
6 imaginary dana said on June 13, 2007
Go Joe Go! Testify!!
7 jordan said on June 13, 2007
i totally and completely relate to EVERY SINGLE WORD of Love Is Hard...
8 imaginary dana said on June 14, 2007
Jordan, wait till you see the Love is Hard that posts tomorrow. I think Rach has outdone herself, seriously.
9 imaginary sero(tone)in said on June 14, 2007
dana may have been thinking of me in regards to the sun kil moon review. i had some pretty harsh words for it at the time. it's not that great, but deserved better than uninformed cheap shots.
10 Joseph Riippi said on June 19, 2007
Cheap shots, yes. But this is music journalism. And I stand by my ranking if for no reason but that I had forgotten the album existed until the day this posting went up.
How were the cheap shots uninformed, though? I'm not trying to be hostile or anything, I'm just curious. Obviously I'm not a diehard fan so I don't know them that well, as can be any fans argument against a panning review, but I listen to everything I review at least three times start-finish before making notes to write about it and I've been a Kozelek fan for awhile. If the record deserves a better score, it's not because it was better than i said it was, it was just that I let my disappointment get in teh way.
Post new comment