Tonight in Seattle:  

Where the Wild Things Are: of rumpuses and monster faces

Where the Wild Things Are Monsters

{Where the Wild Things Are opens in Seattle Friday, 10/16 and is playing at the Meridian, the Majestic Bay, and the Metro}

Almost as soon as I found out that 826 Seattle was holding a preview benefit screening of Where the Wild Things Are–probably my most highly anticipated film this year–I bought tickets. A wise move, as it quickly sold out (the screening raised an awesome $47,000!). 

The energy in line and inside the Cinerama was kind of amazing. Most people seemed to really get into the spirit of things, wearing the gold paper crowns passed out at the door and buzzing happily about being able to attend. Teri Hein, founder of 826 Seattle, introduced screenwriter Dave Eggers and star Max Records before the film for a quick Q&A. Eggers gracefully spun attention away from himself and focused on 826 and their young guest by asking witty questions about injuries sustained while filming and working with Director Spike Jonze (reportedly quite the prankster)—as well as encouraging the audience to "howl when appropriate" during the film. That might sound a little dry written down, so let me clarify: my brains were basically falling out of my head from excitement by the time the movie started.

Max Records (as…Max) uses his fresh-faced enthusiasm and soulful eyes to draw you into the story of a lost and lonely little boy almost as soon as the film starts to roll. Relationship problems with his now-distant teenage sis and busy single mom cause Max to retreat into a fantasy world ruled by monsters with complex personalities who take pleasure in destroying things, and have quite a few issues of their own. In other words: Wild Things aren’t all about fun & games, even if Max would like them to be. The plot is definitely simplified, but there’s a deeper seriousness implied. The dialog is exactly what you’d think a 9-year-old boy would imagine, conveying the struggle of a kid trying to make sense of situations that are just beyond his realm of understanding and process them in a way that makes sense.

Max Records

What I think really makes the film really work is the incredible amount of detail put into the sets, scenery, and costuming. The creatures are recognizably identifiable to fans of Sendak’s book, with the added expansion of some awesome personalities created by Jonze & Eggers. The monsters' faces express a mind-blowing amount of emotion (the James Gandolfini-voiced Carol broke my heart in damn near every scene), which I was surprised to learn was added post-production by animation. The execution is flawless; I definitely felt like I was watching the monsters "act" in every scene, and not just listening to recognizable voices attached to furry costumes. And one of the things I loved the most is that the monsters are assigned normal human names: Carol, Douglas, Alexander, KW, Judith & Ira, which somehow made them seem more real to me. This isn’t just an adaptation of a beloved children’s book—it’s a reworking of the story that captures the essence of the thing and blows it out in a way that’s both unexpected and familiar.

Of course the big question that everyone seems to want an answer to is whether this movie is for kids or adults. These kinds of questions always confuse me, because isn’t that almost totally up to the person seeing the film? It’s both, of course. It just depends on what you’re expecting when you go in, and what you take from it when you leave. Some kids are going to be scared of the monsters, and some kids aren’t. Some will be able to read a deeper meaning; some won’t. I’d wager that adults will react in a similar way, but as for myself, I reveled in the absolute joy of this movie. The battle cry of "Let the Wild Rumpus begin!" thrilled me in ways I can’t describe, and I plan to buy it as soon as it’s available.

Where the Wild Things Are

WtWTA is also playing at the IMAX people! Just FYI. ;)
I just saw this last night after almost a year of anticipation when I first saw what I consider to be, without a doubt, the best trailer of the year. Maybe it was the long wait, maybe it was the tainted memories of this book from my childhood, maybe it was the high-expectations (Dave Eggers and Spike Jonez and a book beloved by every literate American), but I was so let down. I would rather that the entire part of the film during which Max meets and becomes the king of the wild things had been silent than be full of what reeked of Eggers' snipped and sardoinc dialogue (which I typically adore). It just didn't work here. The visual aspects of the film were stunning, but I found myself made uncofortable by both the dialogue and the voices of the monsters. I really wanted this film to be the best. Ever. Maybe when that's your expectation, you're bound to be let down.
Chelsea: I know exactly what you're talking about, and I have definitely done the same thing with many a movie! For me, I went in only with expectations that it would LOOK amazing, and it did. That said, the dialogue of the monsters made sense to me, in that I feel that's how a kid would apply feelings & things he didn't understand to characters he made up.
I think Chelsea's right, but not about the expectations thing; this movie just isn't very good.

I went in, I think, completely open-minded (I wasn't super-anticipating it and it wasn't directed by Brett Ratner or Michael Bay, so I didn't have any axes that needed grinding). I thought the movie was actually pretty conventional, especially considering that it was directed by Spike Jonze, whose *Being John Malkovich* and *Adaptation* weren't. Yes, it's visually stunning, but that's it and moreover, so?

I think the problem lies with Max in this movie (not the Max I vaguely remember from when I first started learning to read), who is not a good kid with a hyperactive imagination; he's a brat who expects the world to revolve around him. I'm certain I never believed that when I was 9 (I didn't start believing that until I wrote my last two status updates on Facebook). I didn't spend the film wondering what his imagination would think of next, I spent 90 minutes wondering when his poor, over-taxed mom, played by the tired-looking Catherine Keener, would find the time to ground him.

Chris: I didn't feel that way about him at all...and I disagree about it not being a very good movie. But I DO agree that this is one of those movies people will either love or hate - based on the reactions of my friends who have seen it. However, I think you could say that about all Spike Jonze films. I knew coming out that not everyone would love it, but *I* did.
Chris: No offense, but you sound old. You shouldn't lose sight that this is a kid's movie that doesn't talk down to kids. It is Max telling you a story. The movie reminds you want a screwed up and scary place a child's mind can be.
Owen @ 6: Were you on my lawn when you left that comment?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.