imaginary dana said on June 30, 2008:

@The Grim I don't think that P4k needs to, should be, or frankly, can be ignored. In fact, I don't have the bone to pick with P4k that many writers and music fans feel. I don't always agree with their reviews, but I admire them and think they have some very good writers in their midst.

I understand Sarah's frustration here, however. As someone who enthusiastically champions local bands, it's super exciting to see one that you've followed start gaining broader attention. But when a bigger publication like P4k moves in and slams a band like that -- well, that can be devastating. Night Canopy is a good example: that record and Cave Singers were both Pretty Girls Make Graves offshoot bands, and both released records last year. Night Canopy got a 5, Cave Singers got a 6.8. Guess which band is flourishing? I'm not saying P4k is entirely to blame, but I would bet that Night Canopy would have sparked a lot more national interest if they'd gotten a strong review. {Incidentally, I liked that record quite a bit.}

So -- it's not P4k's fault that they're so influential, but it IS frustrating as a fan to see a performer you're cheering for get potentially squashed.

Which is entirely relevant, whether you want it to be or not, ya know?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <strike> <object> <param> <embed>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options