@7:
the inclusion of albums and singles (and non-single album tracks) is simply lazy. shouldn't mojo be working on their bi-monthly joy division special edition issue?
@12:
i think the uk takes depeche mode much less seriously than america. i've read it before and i definitely see it in indie lists.
also:
what constitutes indie, really? are radiohead not indie because a lot of people like them or because they are on a major label? if either is the case, why are the smiths #1 on this list when they are both very liked and very much on a major label?
Reviews
cosby said on February 8, 2008:
@7:
the inclusion of albums and singles (and non-single album tracks) is simply lazy. shouldn't mojo be working on their bi-monthly joy division special edition issue?
@12:
i think the uk takes depeche mode much less seriously than america. i've read it before and i definitely see it in indie lists.
also:
what constitutes indie, really? are radiohead not indie because a lot of people like them or because they are on a major label? if either is the case, why are the smiths #1 on this list when they are both very liked and very much on a major label?